The FGM Propaganda: Institutional Vested Interests

http://www.shiftingsands.org.uk/damaging-fgm-propaganda-from-barnardos-and-nspcc/

When bodies/individuals with vested interests are appointed or funded to drive a cause, you can’t get anything than injustices driven by greed. The defining question to the rest of us who still have the element of humanity and compassion in us is, ”what happens to the families; men, women and children (obviously from the migrant’s communities) who have been damaged by these activities?”

It’s great that women are now rising up to challenge the same excuse some of them have been advised to use to secure their ways in the UK and which narratives unfortunately added to the wrong survey.

FGM & THE INACCURATE NARRATIVES

As we remember the compassionate and merciful redemption of the human race by our Lord and Saviour, there is a need for us to be conscious of actions, especially by the government, agencies and organisations, that are indeed injurious to the common good.

The complexity of these actions is that they are hidden under movements, campaigns and policies which are projected to the public as necessary for the common good and thought-through policies based on facts.

Just like some of these actions already exposed  in the past, the Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) which had so loudly blocked our ears in the past 2 years has been found to not be evidenced or fact-based as you can read from the attached  link below:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5540921/Four-cases-female-genital-mutilation-carried-Britain.html

Interestingly, there has not been protest to this report either from the government or the organisations hired to proclaim the political FGM chorus.

We are not saying that FGM is not real but according to the Daily Mail Online report above ”A two-year study found just 61 confirmed instances – and all but four were before the girls came to live in this country.” Meanwhile, the research leading to the report started on the notion that there could be as high as 137,000 victim in England and Wales alone. This is contrary to the usual government-backed narratives that FGM is being done underground in the UK and that many girls were taken abroad for the purposes of FGM during the school holiday periods. This narrative is not only inaccurate, unfair and since it is targeted at only the people of colour, it is discriminatory!

Excerpt from our Facebook page on 29 March 2018.

”There are many causes which are moral on their own but when any becomes a political propaganda or a movement to discriminate a particular ethnic group or a means of livelihood to some scrap-eater is bound to fail at a point.

Meanwhile, many families, marriages especially from the African communities have been affected, subjected to in-necessary distress and pressure by the mad and insane choruses of these villains.

At the end of the day, it was all farce! Meanwhile, the UK and Scottish governments have spent so much on these campaigns which were deliberately chasing shadows and feeding the world with inaccurate statistics” – Director, AFCAE. ”

Someone’s going to hands-up for this but do we know how many marriages that have been destroyed and families separated because of this? Do we know the number of children that have been separated and ripped-off their families into social care? Do we know how many fathers or mothers whom have been pushed to depression  and had suffered emotional breakdown because of these inaccurate narratives? What of the ones already deported? What are we going to do to mitigate the losses suffered by these people of colour?

A write-up by one Hannelore Van Bavel, a research student in the Department of Anthropology and Sociology (University of London) through the SOAS blog site queried the UK (and of course) the West claim of zero tolerance to FGM. The piece is on www.soas.co.uk and under the topic ”FGM: Zero tolerance to what?

Hannelore Van Bavel stated clearly that while the Western-style genital piercings which meet the FGM definition are not problematized like the targeted people of colour; African and Asian communities. She claimed that around 200 girls under the age of 18 in UK have undergone these genital piercings in 2015-16 and around 150 of them were under 15. She sort of challenged FGM being a gender equality issue when both sexes undergo circumcision and also challenged it being a Human rights issue since people should be allowed to choose what they want to do with their bodies rather than the government coercing them. She asked ”Is a zero tolerance approach really what we have now, if white women who trim their labia to live up to a cultural beauty standard are celebrated as sexually empowered, while black women who go through a similar practice to live up to cultural standard of womanhood are portrayed as passive victims?”

Please read the full report here: https://www.soas.ac.uk/blogs/study/fgm-zero-tolerance/

We are not saying that FGM does not exist and should not be looked into (especially Infibulation which is said to account for 10% of the cases and considered more healthy) but the campaign against FGM should not be based on inaccurate narratives targeted at discriminating a people’s culture unfairly.

Is there a colonial legacy practice of obsession for the African ”cultural practices” and the lack of attention for Western harmful practices as Hannelore Van Bavel opined?